JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #302092

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 57
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Sunday, August 8, 2004 : 4:00 PM to 5:50 PM
Sponsor: Business and Economics Statistics Section
Abstract - #302092
Title: On Multiple-hypotheses-testing and Model Selection
Author(s): Kasing Man*+ and Chung Chen
Companies: Syracuse University and Syracuse University
Address: Whitman School of Management, Syracuse, NY, 13244,
Keywords: time series ; model selection ; vector ARMA model
Abstract:

It is of interest to study the presence or the absence of specific dynamic relations between time series. Chen and Lee (1990) proposed a multiple-hypotheses-testing procedure in a vector ARMA framework to identify the possible dynamic relation (which include independent, contemporaneous relation, unidirectional relation, and feedback relation) between time series. This paper extends this procedure to account for strong form relationship. It is a sequential inference procedure based on the likelihood ratio tests on models with various parametric constraints. On the other hand, viewing models with different parametric constraints as different models, they can be compared using model selection criteria such as AIC and BIC. It will be interesting to see how the two approaches compare and relate to each other. Simulation studies indicate that the performance of AIC is similar to the procedure conducting at a higher significance level; while BIC at a lower significance level. For empirical analysis, we study some economic time series to illustrate the procedures. Robustness of the results over possible alternative model specification will be addressed.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004