JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #302047

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 272
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Bayesian Statistical Science
Abstract - #302047
Title: Predicting Gaussian Fields with Unknown Covariance Structure
Author(s): Elizabeth C. Shamseldin*+ and Richard L. Smith
Companies: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and University of North Carolina
Address: Department of Statistics, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-326,
Keywords: spatial model ; Bayesian analysis ; kriging ; MCMC ; spatial covariance structure ; covariance estimate error
Abstract:

Spatial models are concerned with the underlying covariance structure between a collection of measurements. The theory can be applied to a number of areas including environmental applications such as monitor readings of an atmospheric pollutant such as particulate matter. Traditional spatial systems are modelled as Gaussian random fields whose covariances are some function of the distance between two monitor sites (for example, the exponential or Matern models). "Kriging" is a method of spatial interpolation that uses the covariances to construct optimal estimators of the random field at unobserved locations. However, traditional interval estimates using kriging assume the spatial covariance structure is known, ignoring the possible error in estimating the parameters of a spatial model. Bayesian methods provide one possible resolution of this difficulty, but in general it is unknown whether a Bayesian prediction interval has the correct frequentist coverage probability. We consider traditional kriging methods, Bayesian MCMC methods, and analytic approximations to Bayesian methods to calculate prediction intervals for spatial interpolation.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004