JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #302028

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 388
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #302028
Title: Regression-based Statistical Matching: Recent Developments
Author(s): Chris Moriarity*+ and Fritz J. Scheuren
Companies: U.S. General Accounting Office and NORC, University of Chicago
Address: 200 Spring Ave., Takoma Park, MD, 20912,
Keywords: data fusion
Abstract:

We have described a method in several articles (2001, 2003) for statistically matching two samples. One sample is assumed to contain (X,Z) and the other is assumed to contain (X,Y), both drawn from a common nonsingular normal (X,Y,Z) distribution. Following Kadane (1978) and Rubin (1986), we employ regression in our approach. We assess the uncertainty introduced during the match that is due to the unobserved (Y,Z) relationship by repetition over a range of (Y,Z) values that are consistent with the observed data. In the final step of our algorithm, we replace predicted values with observed data by a match of the two samples to obtain final files consisting only of observed data, consistent with traditional statistical matching procedures. Prior to matching, we add random residuals to our regression-based estimates, an essential step in our method. Our approach for estimation of the amount of residual to add, using subtraction and estimates from both files, can be negative. Rassler (2002) suggests a different approach for residual estimation, which is always non-negative. We compare the two methods and discuss other recent developments.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004