JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #301395

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 430
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Thursday, August 12, 2004 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: General Methodology
Abstract - #301395
Title: Evaluation of Approximate P Values in Logistic Regression
Author(s): Xiaohong Zhang*+ and Lynn R. LaMotte
Companies: Iowa State University and Louisiana State University
Address: Dept. of Statistics, Ames, IA, 50011,
Keywords: approximate p value ; exact p value ; chi-square statistics ; logistic regression
Abstract:

The logistic regression model is widely used in applications where the response variable of interest takes binary values. Exact p values for testing coefficients equal to zero can be obtained from binomial probabilities. When the number of predictor variables in regression models or observations is considerably large, acquiring exact p values may cause intensive computational difficulties. In such cases, p values obtained from the chi-squared distribution provide a way of approximation. We explore the accuracy of this approximation method in this work. Fisher-Scoring method is used to simulate SAS built-in procedures to get estimated p values and test statistics. The exact p values are obtained by computing the probabilities from binomial distributions. The datasets with different numbers of predictors, different values of x, and different number of observations of each x are used as examples. Agreement of approximate p values and exact p values is good in most cases. Approximate p value is more conservative than exact p value in the overall performance. Decreasing the number of predictors orincreasing the number of observations of each x can increase the agreement.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004