JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #300928

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 369
Type: Topic Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #300928
Title: An Empirical Study on Using ACS Supplementary Survey Data in SAIPE State Poverty Models
Author(s): Elizabeth T. Huang*+
Companies: U.S. Census Bureau
Address: , Washington, DC, 20233 ,
Keywords: small-area estimation ; Fay-Herriott model ; American Community Survey
Abstract:

The Census Bureau's Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) program produces state poverty estimates from a Fay-Herriot model applied to direct state estimates from the Current Population Survey (CPS). In recent years supplementary surveys for the American Community Survey (ACS) have also produced state poverty estimates. While their different data collection procedures mean that these estimates should have different nonsampling errors than the CPS, they have the advantage of being based on much larger samples. We take data from the 2001 supplementary survey of ACS (SS01) and examine alternative models that use the SS01 data in different ways reflecting different assumptions about the relative biases between the SS01 and CPS estimates. We then examine the prediction error variances from the various models including the SAIPE production models without the SS01 data. The overall conclusions are that there is significant potential for improving the state poverty estimates by using the supplementary survey data in the models, and that the amount of improvement depends on what one assumes about relative biases in the estimates.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004