JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #300918

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 274
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Biopharmaceutical Section
Abstract - #300918
Title: FDR-based Methods for Determining Replicate Size For Microarray Experiments
Author(s): Vishwanath Iyer*+ and Sanat K. Sarkar
Companies: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Temple University
Address: 5 Research Pkwy., Wallingford, CT, 06492,
Keywords: replicate size ; FDR ; microarray ; FNR ; sample size
Abstract:

One issue that has received considerable attention recently has been the determination of the number of DNA array replicates that one needs to use to be "reasonably certain" that the differences one observes between control and treatments are "real." The challenge has been to strike a balance between the cost of expensive replicates and some measure of statistical judiciousness. The exploratory nature of these experiments allows us the leeway of considering methods based on the less strict criterion of controlling the False Discovery Rate (FDR) instead of the more conservative Familywise Error Rate (FWER). Previously, we derived an exact formula for FDR and its conjugate quantity, the False Negative Rate (FNR) and described a method to select a replicate size based on these two criteria under certain stringent assumptions. We compared different multiplicity adjustment methods, and their effect on replicate size. We propose an approximation to the exact formula that significantly decreases computation time. We explore relaxing the normality assumptions from the previous paper.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004