JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #300787

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 423
Type: Topic Contributed
Date/Time: Thursday, August 12, 2004 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Biometrics Section
Abstract - #300787
Title: A Two-stage Method for Multiple-hypothesis-testing
Author(s): Shuhui Wen*+ and Chu-Hsing Hsiao
Companies: National Taiwan University and Yuanpei University of Science and Technology and National Taiwan University
Address: , Taiwan, , R.O.C.
Keywords: association test ; Bonferroni ; false positive rate ; SNP marker ; multiple-hypothesis-testing ; two-stage
Abstract:

Recent association studies often involve a large number of markers under investigation and thus lead to the problem of multiple hypothesis testing. Traditional Bonferroni's procedure is too conservative in the sense that much attention has been focused on reducing the Type I error and a strict threshold is employed due to a large number of tests considered simultaneously. The current interest, however, lies in the identification of markers mostly of mild effect. In other words, the goal may be better achieved via reducing the probability of false negatives among those with association. The two types of errors cannot be minimized at the same time. We propose a two-stage method for multiple testing procedure. The main principle is to remove those obviously unassociated markers and retain those of mild effect in the first stage, followed by a test that adjusts for the possibly incurred error. We provide the implementation of the proposed procedure and derive its theoretical success and failure rates. We also illustrate the derivation of the sample size under this design and recommend the choice between two stages. The performance of the two-stage method is evaluated.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004