JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #300260

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 253
Type: Invited
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Business and Economics Statistics Section
Abstract - #300260
Title: Using Genetic Algorithms to Improve the Construction of Classification, Regression, and Survival Tree Models
Author(s): J. Brian Gray*+ and Guangzhe Fan
Companies: University of Alabama and University of Alabama
Address: Dept. of IS, Statistics, and Mgt. Science, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487-0226,
Keywords: bagging ; CART ; data-mining ; genetic algorithm ; random forests
Abstract:

Tree-structured modeling is a valuable tool for predictive modeling and data mining. Traditional tree-growing methodologies such as CART suffer from "greediness," i.e., local optimizations at nodes to be split in a decision tree do not always result in global optimization of the tree model. CART solutions are also sensitive to perturbations in the data and can vary greatly across different training sets sampled from the same data. Bagging, random forests, and other ensemble techniques have improved on the predictive performance of CART, but they do not have the interpretability of single-tree models. We describe the TARGET (Tree Analysis with Randomly Generated and Evolved Trees) method of constructing tree models for classification, regression, and survival data. Empirical evidence suggests that TARGET produces smaller trees with better predictive performance than CART. TARGET solutions are also found to be more stable than CART solutions across different training samples from the same data.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004