JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #300071

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 170
Type: Invited
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Social Statistics Section
Abstract - #300071
Title: How Does the ACS Measure Up in the Bronx, New York, Test Site?
Author(s): Joseph J. Salvo*+ and Arun P. Lobo and Timothy Calabrese
Companies: NYC Department of City Planning and New York City Department of City Planning and NYC Department of City Planning
Address: 22 Reade Street, New York, NY, 10007,
Keywords: American Community Survey ; data quality ; small-area data ; item allocation ; city planning ; neighborhoods
Abstract:

The American Community Survey (ACS) is slated to replace the 2010 Census long form, based on the premise that the ACS is capable of creating an accurate and useful socioeconomic picture of sub-county areas, such as neighborhoods in large cities. This study compares estimates from the 1999-2001 ACS and the 2000 Census for 88 neighborhoods in Bronx County, New York. It asks whether estimates from the ACS can replace those from the census sample by drawing a picture of similarities and differences; meaningful differences are defined in this study as those that can affect the work of a large city planning agency. The results show that, despite some important conceptual differences, most estimates from the 1999-2001 ACS do not differ from those in the 2000 Census in a meaningful way; however, there are some important exceptions. Examining differences in the context of the data collection effort (mail return rates, household nonresponse rates) and in terms of data quality (item allocation levels) leads to a better understanding of differences between the two surveys.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004