JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #302273

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 250
Type: Other
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: ASA
Abstract - #302273
Title: Forensic Analysis: Statistical Comparison of Bullet Lead Compositions
Author(s): Karen Kafadar*+ and Cliff Spiegelman
Companies: University of Colorado, Denver and Texas A&M University/The Texas Transportation Institute
Address: PO Box 173364, Dept. of Mathematics Box 170, Denver, CO, 80217-3364,
Keywords:
Abstract:

Since the 1960s, FBI has performed Compositional Analysis of Bullet Lead (CABL), a forensic technique that compares the elemental composition of bullets found at a crime scene to that of bullets found in a suspect's possession. CABL has been used when no gun is recovered, or when bullets are too small or fragmented to compare striations on the casings with those on the gun barrel. The National Academy of Sciences formed a Committee charged with the assessment of CABL's scientific validity. The report, "Forensic Analysis: Weighing Bullet Lead Evidence,'' included discussion on the effects of the manufacturing process on the validity of the comparisons, the precision and accuracy of the chemical measurement technique, and the statistical methodology used to compare two bullets and test for a "match." This talk will focus on the statistical analysis: the FBI's methods of testing for a "match,', the apparent false positive and false negative rates, the FBI's clustering algorithm ("chaining"), and the Committee's recommendations. Finally, additional analyses on data made available for future studies will be discussed.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004