JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #301861

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 405
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Thursday, August 12, 2004 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Biopharmaceutical Section
Abstract - #301861
Title: Multiplicity Adjustments for Clinical Trials with Multiple Doses in Two-dose Regimens
Author(s): Peng-Liang Zhao*+ and Hui Quan
Companies: Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Address: RY34-A304, Rahway, NJ, 07065,
Keywords: familywise error rate ; closed procedure ; strong control ; weak control
Abstract:

Typically there is no prior information regarding which dose regimen of an active compound might be more effective or better, therefore two regimens (e.g., once-daily and twice-daily doses) can be considered in a phase II dose-range finding study. After the phase II study, if one regimen (e.g., once-daily dose) is numerically less efficacious than the other regimen, but is more convenient for patients than the other regimen and is also likely to be registrable, multiple doses in both regimens can be included in phase III confirmatory trials and be compared to the control. We discuss multiplicity adjustment procedures for two regimens and multiple doses in these trials. We consider procedures which use the dose-response relationship of each regimen to form the closed procedures and control the familywise Type I error rate in a strong sense. These procedures generally have a higher power than the traditional procedures such as the Bonferroni and the Hochberg procedures for the high doses. We also discuss procedures which control the familywise Type I error rate in a weak sense. Numerical examples will be used to illustrate the applications of our procedures.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004