JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #301772

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 389
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #301772
Title: Using the Peters-Belson Method to Measure Disparity in Complex Surveys
Author(s): Sowmya R. Rao*+ and Barry I. Graubard and Joseph L. Gastwirth
Companies: National Cancer Institute and National Cancer Institute and George Washington University
Address: EPS 8047, 6120 Executive Blvd., MSC 7244, Bethesda, MD, 20892,
Keywords: disparity ; survey methods ; Taylor linearization variance ; delete-one-group jackknife variance ; logistic regression ; multiple linear regression
Abstract:

The Peters-Belson (PB) approach used to assess wage discrimination can also be used to analyze disparities in large surveys for a variety of health and social behaviors including cancer-screening. This approach fits a regression model to the majority group and estimates the expected value a minority individual would have from this equation. The average difference between observed and expected values for the minority members estimates the disparity not explained by the covariates. Because of the complex sample designs of surveys, we show how to apply the Taylor linearization and delete-one-group jackknife methods to estimate standard errors for the disparity. The 1998 National Health interview Survey on cancer-screening among women is used for illustration. We found that the Taylor and jackknife methods gave similar standard errors. Although the jackknife method is easy to apply, it is more computer intensive than the Taylor method. The Taylor linearization method can be easily implemented using the existing software packages with the appropriate commands to account for the complex survey design.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004