JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #300803

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 119
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Monday, August 9, 2004 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Biopharmaceutical Section
Abstract - #300803
Title: Bias in a Placebo-controlled Study Due to Mismeasurement of Disease Status and Regression Effect
Author(s): Hung-Mo Lin*+ and Robert H. Lyles and John M. Williamson
Companies: Pennsylvania State University and Emory University and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Address: College of Medicine, A210, Health Eval Sci., Hershey, PA, 17033,
Keywords: bias ; misclassification ; placebo-controlled trial ; regression to the mean ; intervention
Abstract:

We raise the concern of whether the use of a placebo group in a randomized clinical trial is sufficient to eliminate bias in the assessment of the effectiveness of a drug when enrollment into the trial prior to intervention requires diagnosis of a dichotomous disease, and the diagnostic test is subject to uncertainty. Due to misclassification and the regression effect, the observed difference in the proportions of diseased individuals between the treatment and placebo groups at follow-up will be equal to the true difference multiplied by the positive predictive value at screening and the difference between the sensitivity and the false-positive value at follow-up. Thus, measurement error of disease status before and after administering the intervention attenuates the intervention effect. We provide the statistical methods required for variance estimation and inference about the intervention effect after correcting for RTM. Validation data corresponding to both the screening and follow-up conditions are necessary to provide additional information on the validity of the diagnostic test.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004