JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #300290

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 361
Type: Invited
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences
Abstract - #300290
Title: Pooling for Detection of Synergistic Compounds
Author(s): Jacqueline M. Hughes-Oliver*+
Companies: North Carolina State University
Address: Dept. of Statistics, Raleigh, NC, 27695-8203,
Keywords: antagonism ; blocking ; drug discovery ; group testing ; high-throughput screening ; synergism
Abstract:

Drug discovery is a multiphase process that requires identification of chemically distinct classes of lead compounds. Given a particular target or biological assay, lead compounds must demonstrate high potencies. Screening to identify potential leads or active compounds can be both time-consuming and expensive because of the large numbers of compounds available in either real or virtual libraries. Motivated by historical observations that only a small fraction, say 5%, of tested compounds are active to a particular assay, some pharmaceutical companies now use pooling experiments for screening. Pooling experiments, where multiple compounds are tested in a single well, are cost-effective and information-dense. They are also ideal for detecting synergism, where two or more compounds are required to achieve activity. Unfortunately, their analysis can be fraught with difficulties. One such difficulty arises from blocking mechanisms that result in an inactive pool containing active compounds. I will present some methods for analyzing pooling experiments, discuss their successes and failures, and illustrate application to a real dataset.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004