JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #300201

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 99
Type: Invited
Date/Time: Monday, August 9, 2004 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Section on Statistics in Epidemiology
Abstract - #300201
Title: The Causal Effect of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy on Coronary Heart Disease
Author(s): Miguel A. HernĂ¡n*+ and James Robins
Companies: Harvard School of Public Health and Harvard School of Public Health
Address: Epidemiology Dept., Boston, MA, 02115,
Keywords: causal inference ; observational studies ; survival analysis
Abstract:

The Nurses' Health Study (NHS) found a lower risk of coronary heart disease among users of postmenopausal hormone therapy. The Women's Health Initiative (WHI), a randomized trial, reported the opposite finding. The following limitations of the NHS design may explain the discrepancy: (1) lack of comparability between women that did and did not initiate therapy, (2) lack of comparability between women who continued and discontinued therapy, and (3) inability to detect short-term effects of therapy. The NHS can be conceptualized as a randomized trial with unknown randomization probabilities. We describe a study protocol for the NHS trial and propose its re-analysis under the intention to treat principle, which is immune to bias due to explanation 2. We use different statistical models (Cox proportional hazards, accelerated failure time, risk ratio models) to reduce the possibility of bias due to idiosyncratic misspecification of any particular model. We propose a strategy to assess the influence of explanation 3. Finally, we describe analyses to assess the sensitivity of our causal estimates to bias from explanation 1.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004