JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #300054

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 63
Type: Invited
Date/Time: Monday, August 9, 2004 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Section on Health Policy Statistics
Abstract - #300054
Title: The State of the Art in Diagnostic Test Meta-analysis
Author(s): Christopher H. Schmid*+
Companies: Tufts-New England Medical Center
Address: 750 Washington St, Boston, MA, 02111,
Keywords: diagnostic tests ; meta-analysis ; ROC curves ; random effects ; multilevel model
Abstract:

Diagnostic testing occupies an increasing share of the focus and costs of health care. This share will only increase as imaging and genetic-screening applications proliferate. Because each technique is usually evaluated in multiple studies, meta-analysis can help combine the results. Nevertheless, relative to reviews of treatment efficacy, new medical tests are infrequently reviewed. We believe that part of the reason is the lack of appropriate methods for combining diagnostic test data. We have surveyed the literature on meta-analysis of diagnostic tests of medical procedures and technologies, collecting every study published since 1990. We describe the methods used, their appropriateness, and whether use of more sophisticated analytic multilevel models might change the conclusions of the studies. Many of the methods employed are simple summaries of sensitivity and specificity or use the summary receiver operating curve. Most are fixed effects methods that do not properly account for between-study heterogeneity. We focus on aspects of study design that introduce heterogeneity between studies and explore whether certain factors may be able to explain this heterogeneity.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004