Abstract #302377

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #302377
Activity Number: 9
Type: Invited
Date/Time: Sunday, August 3, 2003 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: IMS
Abstract - #302377
Title: New Approaches to False Discovery Control in Multiple Testing with Applications to Neuroimaging
Author(s): Christopher Genovese*+ and Larry A. Wasserman
Companies: Carnegie Mellon University and Carnegie Mellon University
Address: Dept. of Statistics, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213,
Keywords: multiple testing ; False Discovery Rates ; Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:

Multiple testing problems arise frequently in modern applications. In functional neuroimaging in particular, a common analysis involves performing a hypothesis test at every volume element in the brain to locate brain activity. Traditional multiple testing methods seek strong control of the familywise error rate. Benjamini & Hochberg (1995) introduced a new criterion--the False Discovery Rate--and put forward a procedure to control it. The False Discovery Rate is the expected proportion of false discoveries among the rejected null hypotheses. I will introduce new methods for controlling other features of the false discovery distribution, especially quantiles. A key to this approach is to study the proportion of false discoveries as a stochastic process in the rejection threshold. I will describe methods for constructing confidence envelopes for this unobserved process and techniques for constructing thresholds with desirable error control properties. The techniques extend in an interesting way to spatial and clustering problems on random fields.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003