Abstract #302291

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #302291
Activity Number: 241
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 5, 2003 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Business & Economics Statistics Section
Abstract - #302291
Title: Multiple Testing in Fair Lending Monitoring
Author(s): Carla H. Inclan*+ and Anne Kerttula
Companies: Ernest & Young and Ernst & Young, LLP
Address: Quantitative Economics and Statistics, Washington, DC, 20036,
Keywords: fair lending ; multiple testing
Abstract:

Statistical methods can be used to test for patterns in loan underwriting or pricing that may raise fair lending concerns. Lenders may conduct testing by divisions, branches, or even by individual loan officers. Additionally, a critical element in fair lending testing is that comparisons be made across similarly situated applicants in order to yield meaningful comparisons. This can be achieved by segmentation of applicants into similar groups. Segmentation typically leads to multiple tests per unit of analysis, and requires adjustments when obtaining critical values for the tests. This paper explores alternative ways of addressing this issue. Using simulated data, we attempt to quantify the effect of correlation among multiple tests on the adjustments to the critical values, and on the test findings. An alternative way to compare similarly situated borrowers uses regression models to simultaneously control for the applicant and transaction characteristics that affect the underwriting or pricing outcomes, thus reducing the need for segmentation and mitigating issues arising from multiple testing.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003