Abstract #301262

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #301262
Activity Number: 294
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 5, 2003 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Statistical Computing
Abstract - #301262
Title: Simulated Annealing for Scoring Based on Item Response Theory
Author(s): Lianghua Shu*+ and Aviva Lev-Ari and Werner Wothke
Companies: CTB/McGraw-Hill and CTB/McGraw-Hill and CTB/McGraw-Hill
Address: 20 Ryan Ranch Rd., Monterey, CA, 93940,
Keywords: scoring ; simulated ; annealing ; item ; response
Abstract:

This paper applies simulated annealing (SA) to item response theory (IRT). IRT-based scoring finds an integer pattern score (PS) by maximizing likelihood function over a range of reportable scores for a given student's response vector (RV). It is well known that the traditional Newton method sometimes gets trapped in local maxima. As an optimization technique, SA can statistically guarantee finding correct PS, but it can be slow. To speed it up, we modified SA (MSA) by using the random integer generator instead of random real number generator in the standard SA. Over a quarter of a million RVs are used to evaluate the three algorithms: SA, exhaustive search (ES) and grid search (GS). ES always guarantee finding the correct PS. The MSA runs more than 4 times faster than ES with the same accuracy. GS algorithm initially (grid) searches function slopes to set the starting points for the Newton algorithm. The scoring accuracy of GS depends on the number of initial grid points. With the appropriate grid points, GS runs 3 times faster than MSA. Result also shows that SA is insensitive to the starting point. Further research on improving the speed of the above 3 algorithms is under way.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003