Abstract #301136

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #301136
Activity Number: 96
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Monday, August 4, 2003 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Biometrics Section
Abstract - #301136
Title: Priority Estimations by Pair Comparisons: AHP, Thurstone Scaling, Bradley-Terry-Luce, and Markov Stochastic Modeling
Author(s): Stan Lipovetsky*+ and Michael Conklin
Companies: Custom Research, Inc. and Custom Research, Inc.
Address: 8401 Golden Valley Rd., Minneapolis, MN, 55427-4486,
Keywords: Chapman-Kolmogorov ; pair-comparisons ; AHP ; Thurstone ; Bradley-Terry-Luce ; Markov
Abstract:

Several ways of priority estimation by pairwise data are considered. Thurstone Scaling and Bradley-Terry-Luce models use priority evaluation by frequency of the empirical preferences among the items. Analytic Hierarchy Process evaluates priority vector by elicited pairwise ratio matrix. We consider a modified AHP for robust preferences estimation by a transformed matrix of preferences shares. We show that all these methods are related to the Markov Stochastic Processing in the form of Chapman-Kolmogorov equations. This approach uses pair comparison data for intensity of transitions among the items for constructing a system of differential equations, and solves it for the dynamic and the eventually reached steady-state probabilities. Markov model elaborates a cardinal scale of probabilities of choice of the items in comparison, and its numerical results are close to Bradley-Terry model. Comparison of the results of Markov modeling with Thurstone and modified AHP approaches suggests that the Thurstone and AHP priorities can be interpreted as eventual probabilities to belong to the states corresponded to the compared items. The considered technique enriches the pair comparisons field.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003