Abstract #301087

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #301087
Activity Number: 334
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 6, 2003 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Biometrics Section
Abstract - #301087
Title: Controlling False Discovery (FD) When Planning Microarray Experiments
Author(s): Eric R. Siegel*+ and Trey Spencer and Rudolph S. Parrish
Companies: University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and University of Arkansas For Medical Sciences
Address: 4301 W. Markham St., Slot 781, Little Rock, AR, 72205,
Keywords: microarray ; multiple comparison ; false discovery ; planning
Abstract:

Sophisticated resampling methods exist to control FD in microarray experiments once the data are in hand. Less attention has been paid to control of FD during the design stage. In this context, Simon proposes controlling Expected FD for tests on k genes as follows: simply choose the level p of test such that kp =< u, where u is the desired Expected FD. We propose a method almost as simple as Simon's for controlling Actual FD. Since FD is binomially distributed, one can calculate the exact binomial probability Pr{FD =< u|Bin(k,p)} of having u or fewer false discoveries. One can then adjust the level p of test needed to raise this probability to a desired "1 - alpha" confidence level, thus controlling Actual FD. For u=0, our method reduces to the Sidak multiple-comparison adjustment. For u>0, the level p of test can be approximated to twelve decimal places using Newton's method in an Excel spreadsheet; convergence typically takes about six iterations.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003