Abstract #300718

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #300718
Activity Number: 299
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 5, 2003 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Biometrics Section
Abstract - #300718
Title: Measuring Agreement between Statistical Methods with Applications to Age Standardization
Author(s): Michael P. Fay*+ and Ji-Hyun Lee
Companies: National Cancer Institute and University of North Carolina
Address: 3205 Adams Mill Rd. NW, Washington, DC, 20010-1008,
Keywords: concordance correlation coefficient ; agreement ; standardization ; vital rates
Abstract:

We propose a measure of agreement between two statistics applied to the same data, which we call the Proportion of Variance Attributable to Choice of Statistic (PVACS). The PVACS ranges from 0 (ideal agreement) to 1. When the expectations of the two statistics are the same, then a transformation of the PVACS equals the concordance correlation coefficient of Lin (1989), which is used to measure agreement between two assays or instruments. When the expectations of the two statistics differ, we show that the PVACS is slightly better for our purposes. First, we explore an instructive example that compares the mean to the median applied to a set of independent random variables from the same distribution. We calculate the PVACS for several distributions and discuss how the PVACS is estimated from the data. Second, we explore a practical example of the PVACS using vital rate data where we compare a ratio of directly standardized rates calculated with one standard with the same ratio calculated using a different standard.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003