Abstract #302175

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #302175
Activity Number: 415
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 6, 2003 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Business & Economics Statistics Section
Abstract - #302175
Title: Robust Modeling for Financial Portfolio Selection
Author(s): Simona Costanzo*+
Companies: London School of Economics
Address: Houghton St., London, , WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom
Keywords: robust ; outliers ; portfolio selection models ; covariance matrices
Abstract:

Despite the old age and the negative criticism concerning Mean-Variance efficient models for selecting financial portfolios, they are still widely used in practice. These methods require estimates for the asset return scatter matrix and location vector. These are commonly the sample mean and variance-covariance matrix, which are maximum likelihood estimates if the underlying distribution is normal. On the contrary the financial literature provides mounting evidence on the returns being long-tailed. It is also known that sample mean and covariance are sensitive to outliers. This paper discusses the construction of a portfolio selection model where the variance-covariance matrix and the expected returns are modeled robustly. Two robust alternatives are proposed. One assumes a heavy-tailed distribution of the returns, the other is obtained via high breakdown estimates of the location vector and scatter matrix. We show evidences in favour of the robust models. Empirical results compare the performances of the "classical" and robust methods and analyze the sensitivity of the estimates to changes in some parameters.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003