Abstract #301801

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #301801
Activity Number: 27
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Sunday, August 3, 2003 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: General Methodology
Abstract - #301801
Title: A Prediction Error Criterion for Choosing the Lower Quantile in Pareto Index Estimation
Author(s): Maria-Pia Victoria-Feser*+ and Debbie J. Dupuis
Companies: University of Geneva and University of Western Ontario
Address: 102 Bd Carl Vogt, Geneva, , , Switzerland
Keywords: tail index ; mean excess function ; goodness-of-fit ; extreme value distributions
Abstract:

The success of estimation of the Pareto tail index from extreme order statistics relies heavily on the procedure used to determine their number. Most of the procedures are based on the minimization of (an estimate of) the asymptotic mean square error of the Hill estimator for the Pareto tail index. The principal drawback of these approaches is that they involve the estimation of nuisance parameters, and therefore can lead to complicated selection procedures. Instead, we propose to use Pareto quantile plots, as defined in Beirlant et al. (1996) for example, and build a prediction error estimator. The latter depends on the quantile at which the data are truncated, and it is minimized to find the optimal number of extreme order statistics. The main advantages of the new approach are computational simplicity and the absence of estimation of nuisance parameters. The prediction error estimator is actually a generalization of Mallows' C_{p} to non-normal regression models. Through a simulation study involving several data generating models, we show that our prediction error criterion performs very well in terms of MSE compared to other procedures.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003