Abstract #301384

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #301384
Activity Number: 455
Type: Invited
Date/Time: Thursday, August 7, 2003 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #301384
Title: Weight Calibration for Surveys with Nonresponse Follow-Up
Author(s): Vincent G. Iannacchione*+ and Avinash C. Singh and Jill A. Dever
Companies: RTI International and RTI International and RTI International
Address: 1615 M St., NW, Washington, DC, 20036-3209,
Keywords: dual-frame estimation ; small-area estimation ; extreme weights ; nonresponse bias ; mean squre error ; weight calibration
Abstract:

In surveys where response rates are low, a follow-up survey of nonrespondents may be used to reduce the nonresponse bias associated with survey estimates. However, when cost considerations require that the follow-up sample size be small, the reduction in bias obtained from the follow-up may be negated by the increase in sampling variance that results from the increased variability in the sampling weights of the combined sample. In this situation, extreme weights may be trimmed to reduce the mean square error (MSE) associated with key survey estimates. We present a weight calibration method that can reduce the MSEs of multiple survey estimates while preserving the known population totals for key variables. Our method is motivated by small area estimation which balances the variance of an unbiased but unstable design-based estimator with a biased but stable model-based estimator. We show that the ideas underlying dual-frame estimation together with sampling weight calibration can be used to develop composite weights to produce estimates that strike a balance between variance and bias. We also apply the method to a nonresponse follow-up for a survey of Gulf War veterans.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003