Abstract #301306

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #301306
Activity Number: 423
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 6, 2003 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Biometrics Section
Abstract - #301306
Title: Exact Trend Tests for Dose-Response Data: Comparisons Under Different Models
Author(s): Man Lai Tang*+ and Hon Keung Tony Ng
Companies: Harvard University Medical School and Southern Methodist University
Address: 91 Kilmarnock St., Boston, MA, 02215-5120,
Keywords: trend test ; dose-response data ; exact conditional approach ; exact unconditional approach
Abstract:

Exact methods for small-sample dose-response studies with binary response will be investigated. For exact conditional approach, nuisance parameters (e.g., the intercept) are factored out by conditioning on their reduced sufficient statistics (e.g., marginal row totals for the intercept under the logit link). Unfortunately, even for simple binary dose-response study exact conditional approach is inapplicable except for logit model. For exact unconditional approach, nuisance parameters are eliminated by using a 'worst-case' scenario. For example, the p value is a tail probability maximized over all possible values for the nuisance parameters. The applicability of exact unconditional approach can readily extend to more general models including logit, probit, one-hit and extreme-value. Comparisons are conducted using the well-known Cochran-Armitage trend test under different model specifications. Our simple empirical studies clearly show that the exact conditional approach is generally inferior to the exact unconditional approach with respect to actual significance level and exact power.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003