Abstract #301272

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #301272
Activity Number: 301
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 5, 2003 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Statistical Education
Abstract - #301272
Title: Bayesian Randomized Response as a Class Project
Author(s): Michele DiPietro*+
Companies: Carnegie Mellon University
Address: Cyert Hall 108, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213-3815,
Keywords: statistical education ; Bayesian simulation ; randomized response ; writing across the curriculum
Abstract:

"Have you ever been in therapy?" is the question that begins the class project described in this paper. Students are instructed to answer according to a randomized response scheme, and then analyze the resulting data to compare the percentage of U.S. and international students seeing a therapist. The project is informed by current learning and motivational theories so that students can use it to explore topics they are interested in. In particular, because the dataset is rather small, students naturally focus on prior elicitation, issues of identifiability and sensitivity analysis. In addition, because of the lack of a closed form solution, students are forced to apply relevant simulation techniques, including rejection sampling, Metropolis-Hastings algorithm, data augmentation, simulation of Bayes factors, and other model selection criteria. Comparison with surprising frequentist results prompts a reflection of the pros and cons of either approach. Because a goal of the project was clear communication of the results, a key stage was the feedback on an early draft, which often led to better statistics as well as better writing. Students' reactions to the project are included.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003