Abstract #301091

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #301091
Activity Number: 172
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Monday, August 4, 2003 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #301091
Title: Using Alternate Address Information to Increase Response Among Active-duty Personnel
Author(s): Nancy A. Clusen*+ and Esther M. Friedman and Mike Hartzell
Companies: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. and Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. and U.S. Department of Defense
Address: 600 Maryland Ave. SW, Washington, DC, 20024-2520,
Keywords: Nonresponse ; Mail survey ; Social surveys-Response rate
Abstract:

The Health Care Survey of DoD beneficiaries monitors the opinions and experiences of military health system beneficiaries. Currently, questionnaires are mailed to beneficiaries at their residential address, yet previous studies indicate that one-quarter of beneficiaries have an incorrect address on the sample frame. For active-duty beneficiaries, the residential address may not be updated as often as the military unit address; moreover, these beneficiaries may or may not receive mail more easily at their unit address. It is therefore difficult to know which mailing address is more appropriate. This phenomenon is not unique and may be observed among other populations, e.g., college students. To improve our understanding of response among active-duty personnel, we randomly assigned a subsample of active-duty beneficiaries to receive their questionnaires at their unit address. The analysis compares treatment and control groups in three areas: rate of nonresponse, characteristics of survey respondents and nonrespondents, and responses to survey items. This study concludes with a discussion of the implications of the findings on survey operations and statistical procedures.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003