Abstract #301076

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #301076
Activity Number: 292
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 5, 2003 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #301076
Title: An Application of a Method of Determining Optimum Number of Call Attempts in a Telephone Survey
Author(s): Kadaba P. Srinath*+ and Pamela Giambo and Susan Lewis Arday
Companies: Abt Associates, Inc. and Abt Associates, Inc. and HCFA
Address: 1110 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC, 20005-3544,
Keywords: mean squared error ; survey cost ; bias reduction
Abstract:

In recent years, nonresponse to data collection attempts in telephone surveys is increasing due to a variety of reasons. Therefore, to reduce bias due to nonresponse, a common practice is to make several call attempts to collect data from eligible households or persons. These additional attempts increase the survey cost, and therefore it is important to determine whether the reduction in bias and the mean squared error is worth the increase in the cost of the survey. We want to determine the optimum number of call attempts taking into account both cost and mean squared error. There are several approaches to determining the optimum number of call attempts. One approach is to compare the cost and mean squared error after each attempt and choose the number of attempts that minimize mean squared error after adjusting for increased cost. We apply this method to determine the number of call attempts in the Survey of Medicare Beneficiaries conducted in 2000 to estimate the influenza vaccination coverage rates.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003