Abstract #300968

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #300968
Activity Number: 172
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Monday, August 4, 2003 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #300968
Title: Optimizing Establishment Response with Tailored Design: A Randomized Trial of Token Incentives and Priority Mail in a Nationwide Survey of Meat Manufacturers
Author(s): Danna Moore*+ and Mike Ollinger and John Tarnai
Companies: Social & Economic Science Research Center and USDA and Social & Economic Science Research Center
Address: PO Box 644014, Pullman, WA, 99164-4014,
Keywords: establishment surveys ; incentives ; priority mail ; mail surveys ; tailored design
Abstract:

This paper demonstrates the outcomes of using tailored design in a USDA nationwide mail survey of meat manufacturers. The objective is to assess whether incentives increase response (i.e., decreasing unit nonresponse) in establishment surveys and to determine whether response quality (i.e., increasing item nonresponse) changes. This study experimentally tests priority postage versus first class mail, use of token incentive, and timing of incentive. This study evaluates whether reaching the named plant quality control manager is affected by use of a $5 incentive and whether it changes completion rate and quality of data for difficult questions. The decision to participate in a survey is not well understood for respondents located within an inner operational area of an establishment. While incentives have been shown to increase response rates in all survey modes, they have not been well tested for establishment surveys across population types and industries and across survey modes. Results show significant differences in response (22.5% vs. 69.8%) between treatment protocols.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003