Abstract #300751

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #300751
Activity Number: 23
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Sunday, August 3, 2003 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences
Abstract - #300751
Title: Maximum Information and Minimum Mean Posterior Variance Criteria for Response Surface Methodology
Author(s): Shilpy Malla*+ and Michael R. Frey and Karl Gerlach
Companies: Bucknell University and Bucknell University and Naval Research Laboratory
Address: Box C-3860, Lewisburg, PA, 17837,
Keywords:
Abstract:

Response surface methodology (RSM) is a suite of methods for determining features of an unknown system response. The response mode---the combination of the system control variable settings yielding the peak system response---is often of key interest. The mode and other response features are estimated in the RSM setting based on measurements of the system response. We consider estimating the response mode based on an interrogation, or sequence of measurements, of the response, adopting a Bayesian perspective to guide our interrogation. We propose two criteria, maximum information and minimum mean posterior variance, for optimally interrogating the system. We show in a simple example how each of these criteria along with current (a priori) knowledge of the mode from previous measurements determines the settings for the next measurement in the interrogation. Our example is a system with a single control variable and a unimodal response with additive exponential measurement error. Applying each of the two criteria, we obtain distinct, but qualitatively similar, rules for choosing the control variable setting in terms of simple conditions on the prior odds.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003