Abstract #300744

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #300744
Activity Number: 425
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 6, 2003 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Biopharmaceutical Section
Abstract - #300744
Title: Statistical Design of Pools Using Optimal Coverage and Minimal Collision
Author(s): Katja Remlinger*+ and Jacqueline M. Hughes-Oliver and S. Stanley Young and Raymond L. H. Lam
Companies: North Carolina State University and North Carolina State University and Glaxo Wellcome Inc. and Glaxo Wellcome Inc. Canada
Address: Dept. of Statistics, Raleigh, NC, 27607,
Keywords: synergism ; uniform cell coverage designs ; blocking ; drug discovery ; high throughput screening ; pooling experiments
Abstract:

Discovery of a new drug involves identification of compounds that are potent with respect to a given biological assay. Chemical libraries, collections of compounds, are very large but only a small number of compounds available for screening are actually potent. One approach to improving screening efficiency is to test compounds in pools, e.g., sets of 10 compounds. The questions that arise are: how should the pools be designed, and can chemical structure help to create pools? We consider two criteria: optimal coverage of the chemical space and minimal similarity between compounds within a pool, i.e., minimal collisions between compounds. This work compares four pooling designs that fulfill one or both of these criteria. The computationally intensive methods are applied to a public dataset and we evaluate each design method by determining how well the design criteria are met. One design, called MC, uniformly dominates all other designs, but all designed pools outperform randomly created pools. Furthermore, we discuss blocking and synergism between compounds as other effects that must be investigated when performing pooling experiments.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003