Abstract #300611

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #300611
Activity Number: 366
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 6, 2003 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Section on Bayesian Stat. Sciences
Abstract - #300611
Title: Effective MCMC for Over-Dispersed Models
Author(s): Subharup Guha*+ and Steven N. MacEachern and Mario Peruggia
Companies: The Ohio State University and Ohio State University and The Ohio State University
Address: #704, Columbus, OH, 43210-1113,
Keywords: benchmark estimation ; importance sampling ; variance reduction
Abstract:

While investigating the posterior distribution of a vector-valued parameter, interest often focuses on whether an over- or underdispersed model belonging to a class provides a good fit to the observed data. If the set of models includes one with a conjugate hierarchical structure, of-the-shelf software like BUGS can be used to easily generate MCMC draws from the posterior. A systematic subsample of draws is often all that is retained for analysis due to the intensive computations involved. Based on this stored subsample, the Bayes factor of each model in the class can be estimated and the "best-fitting" model found. Various features of its posterior can be estimated by importance sampling. Importance link function transformations provide a way to stabilize the importance sampling weights when the best-fitting model corresponds to substantial overdispersion. Further reductions in variability are achieved by the technique of benchmark estimation. We illustrate this methodology using a well-known example from the literature. We also verify the accuracy of expressions for the asymptotic reductions in variance achieved by benchmark-weighted importance sampling estimators.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003