Abstract #300403

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #300403
Activity Number: 232
Type: Topic Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 5, 2003 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Section on Health Policy Statistics
Abstract - #300403
Title: Application of a Propensity Score Approach for Risk Adjustment in Multiple Physician Group Profiling on Asthma Care
Author(s): I-Chan Huang*+
Companies: Johns Hopkins University
Address: 3501 Saint Paul St., Apt. 732, Baltimore, MD, 21218,
Keywords: physician groups ; profiling ; propensity score ; regression-to-the-mean ; risk adjustment
Abstract:

Risk adjustment is used to fairly compare provider performance. However, the commonly applied regression-based risk-adjustment methods cannot guarantee balanced distributions of covariates among providers. We developed a propensity score method to compare performance of multiple providers (20 physician groups). Patient satisfaction with asthma care was the indicator of group performance. We compared this propensity score-based risk-adjustment method to a conventional method using a hierarchical modeling but without propensity score techniques. The propensity score based method was validated by showing its balanced distributions in all covariates among the 20 physician groups. Moreover, the propensity score-based method resulted in substantially different rankings from those of the hierarchical model-based method without using propensity scores (75% of groups differed in absolute ranking, and 50% in quintile ranking, weighted kappa = 0.69). We developed and tested a propensity score method for profiling multiple physician groups, and found that it gives substantially different profiles compared to conventional methods.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003