Abstract #300354

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #300354
Activity Number: 362
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 6, 2003 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Section on Statistics & the Environment
Abstract - #300354
Title: Regionalized Assessment of Clean Water Act Standards
Author(s): Eric P. Smith*+ and Keying Ye
Companies: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Address: Dept. of Statistics, Blacksburg, VA, 24061-0001,
Keywords: Bayesian analysis ; mixed models ; watersheds ; standards assessment ; environmental statistics ; pollution assessment
Abstract:

Under section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, states must identify water segments, where loads of pollutants are violating numeric water quality standards. The most commonly applied approach is to use a raw score approach, in which a stream segment is listed as impaired when greater than 10% of the measurements of water quality conditions exceed a numeric criteria. In the water monitoring process, decisions are often made from data collected on a quarterly (or less frequent) sampling basis for a two-year cycle, which results in a sample of eight observations. Direct estimators from samples of this size are likely to be unreliable and unstable. When data are part of a regional assessment it is possible to use a regional model and "borrow strength" from related areas to find more accurate estimates for an individual area. Typically, estimates from small area estimation methods are more precise than those made using just the individual site information. In this presentation, we describe the use of small area estimation techniques and Bayesian approaches to make the decision to list the segment.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003