Abstract #300209

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #300209
Activity Number: 61
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Sunday, August 3, 2003 : 4:00 PM to 5:50 PM
Sponsor: Biopharmaceutical Section
Abstract - #300209
Title: Spectral Map Analysis--A Method To Analyze Gene Expression Data
Author(s): Luc Bijnens*+ and Paul Lewi and Hinrich Goehlmann and Geert Molenberghs and Luc Wouters
Companies: Janssen Pharmaceutica and Janssen Pharmaceutica and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC and Limburgs University Centrum and Barrier Therapeutics NV
Address: Turnhoutseweg 30, Beerse, , B-2340, Belgium
Keywords: gene expression data ; microarrays ; correspondence factor analysis ; principle component analysis ; spectral map analysis
Abstract:

The simultaneous measurement of the expression level of thousands of genes presents a real challenge to existing statistical software tools because of the complexity and size of the datasets. In this study, three multivariate data analysis methods: principal component analysis (PCA), correspondence factor analysis (CFA), and spectral map analysis (SMA) are compared for their ability to identify clusters of biological samples and genes using data on gene expression levels of leukemia patients (Golub et al. 1999). PCA has the disadvantage that the resulting principal factors are not very informative regarding differential gene expression, while CFA is sensitive to single large values and has difficulties regarding interpretation of the distances between objects. We present SM, an alternative method developed by Lewi (1976). The importance of weighting for the level of gene expression is demonstrated. Proper weighting allows less reliable data to be downweighted and more reliable information to be emphasized. It is shown that weighted SMA outperforms PCA and CFA in finding clusters in the biological samples and identifying genes related to these clusters.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003