Abstract #300079

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #300079
Activity Number: 468
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Thursday, August 7, 2003 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Section on Nonparametric Statistics
Abstract - #300079
Title: On the Use of the Shapiro-Wilk Test in Two-Stage Adaptive Inference for Paired Data
Author(s): Weiwen Miao*+ and Joseph L. Gastwirth and Boris Freidlin
Companies: Macalester College and George Washington University and National Cancer Institute
Address: 1600 Grand Ave., Saint Paul, MN, 55105-1801,
Keywords: Adaptive tests ; Paired data ; power robustness ; Shapiro-Wilk test
Abstract:

Paired data arises in a wide variety of applications where the underlying distribution of the paired differences is often unknown. When the differences are normally distributed, the t-test is optimum. If the differences are not normal, the t-test can have substantially less power than the appropriate optimum test that depends on the unknown distribution. In textbooks, when the normality of the differences is questionable, typically the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test is suggested. An adaptive procedure that uses the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality to decide whether to use the t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test has been employed in several studies. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) introduced another approach: applying both the sign and t-tests on the paired differences in its analysis, the alternative hypothesis is accepted if either test is significant. We investigate the statistical properties of the current adaptive test and the EPA's method and suggests an alternative adaptive test. The new procedure is easy to use and generally has higher empirical power, especially when the differences are heavy-tailed, than the currently used methods.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003