Relevant, accessible sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation Keywords: missing data, clinical trials, multiple imputation, sensitivity analysis Missing data due to early withdrawal are unavoidable in clinical trials, and imply that assumptions are needed for the analysis that cannot be verified from the data at hand. To tackle this issue in a coherent way it is therefore necessary to examine carefully these assumptions in the light of the goal of the analysis. To do this we define two questions: De facto - 'What would be the effect seen in practice if this treatment was applied to the population defined by the trial inclusion criteria' De jure - 'Does the treatment work under the best case scenario' With reference to these two questions, we further define the concept of a deviation from the protocol relevant to the question, which we refer to as a 'deviation'. We then describe a variety of approaches for framing post- deviation distributions of outcome, conditional on observed data. Once this has been done, we argue that multiple imputation provides a flexible practical tool for inference. We illustrate our approach with data from an asthma study.
|
Important Dates & Deadlines
- May 31, 2011
Registration Deadline for All Session Presenters - September 1, 2011
Poster Abstract Online Submission Closes - September 9, 2011
Hotel Reservations Close - September 15, 2011
Conference Registration Closes