Online Program Home
  My Program

All Times EDT

Abstract Details

Activity Number: 414 - Risk Modeling and Regression Techniques
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Thursday, August 12, 2021 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Biometrics Section
Abstract #318674
Title: Association between SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody detection levels and time since viral exposure in humans
Author(s): Hayden Lee Smith* and Jacob Bliss and Katherine Sittig
Companies: UnityPoint Health - Des Moines and UnityPoint Health - Des Moines and UnityPoint Health - Des Moines
Keywords: seroprevalence; coronavirus; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19 Serological Testing; Antibody
Abstract:

BACKGROUND: There is insufficient information on the human immunogenic response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to model waning SARs-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody detection levels given time since a self-reported positive viral test.

METHODS: A seroprevalence study was conducted within a United States (US) health system located in the Midwest. Participating hospital and clinic employees completing a study survey were eligible to receive a free SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody test. A generalized linear model was fit regressing IgG detection levels on time since a known prior infection as documented in the study survey. A literature review was conducted to locate and recreate serial SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody detection level data from external studies. These data were scored based on the study model and used to evaluate the predictive out-of-sample accuracy of the estimate.

RESULTS: Of the 6,009 eligible employees, 2,848 completed the study survey, and 2,118 had antibody testing. Of these employees, 221 reported a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and date they received the positive test result. These data were used to model IgG detection values given time since a prior infection. Antibody testing for these employees was taken a median of 90 (IQR: 59, 153) days since their reported infection. The study model estimated a multiplicative IgG detection decrease of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.00) per day since the prior positive test. Five external studies were found with applicable test information and used to examine out-of-sample model accuracy. Over fifty percent of these external data were recreated and represented 131 patients and greater than 300 individual tests. The crude out-of-sample model error was 0.0 (SE: 0.1) and -0.9 (SE: 0.1) when controlling for patient clusters within studies.

CONCLUSIONS: Given the near-real-time dissemination of pandemic information, flexible modeling strategies and validation processes were explored. The presented modeling approach served to validate the possible utility of the presented IgG prediction model.


Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2021 program