Online Program Home
  My Program

Abstract Details

Activity Number:
Register
430 - Health Policy Statistics Section A.M. Roundtable Discussion (Added Fee)
Type: Roundtables
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 : 7:00 AM to 8:15 AM
Sponsor: Health Policy Statistics Section
Abstract #323570
Title: From Estimates to Consequences: How Do We Make Results of Statistical Analyses Useful for Health Policy Decision Making?
Author(s): Ruth Etzioni*
Companies: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Keywords: evidence-based medicine ; medical decision making ; simulation modeling ; diagnostic testing ; relative risk reduction ; absolute risk reduction
Abstract:

Statistical analyses of health interventions typically target standard parameters of efficacy and harm: Sensitivity, specificity and AUC's for diagnostic tests; mortality risk ratios for cancer screening tests, and hazard ratios for treatment. But for policy panels deciding how to intervene at the population level, alternative metrics of harm and benefit are often of greater interest. In the case of cancer screening, trials yield relative estimates of reduction in disease-specific deaths, but policy panels are often more interested in absolute benefits (number of lives saved per population screened). Similarly, although tests of novel diagnostic markers yield estimates of performance characteristics, markers will ultimately only be useful if they impact downstream outcomes such as (quality-adjusted) life expectancy in a cost-effective manner. This Roundtable will discuss opportunities, methods and challenges that accompany the process of translating standard statistical inferences into policy-relevant consequences. We will consider examples from the fields of disease prevention, screening and treatment and real dilemmas from panels such as the USPSTF in the US and NICE in the UK.


Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2017 program

 
 
Copyright © American Statistical Association