JSM 2015 Preliminary Program

Online Program Home
My Program

Abstract Details

Activity Number: 693
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Thursday, August 13, 2015 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Section on Medical Devices and Diagnostics
Abstract #317121 View Presentation
Title: Is HemoGenix Assay HALO 96 PCAEQ Really CFU-Equivalent Progenitor Cell Assay?
Author(s): Pingfu Fu* and Jane Reese and Brittney Hooper
Companies: Case Western Reserve University and Case Western Reserve University and Case Western Reserve University
Keywords: HemoGenix assay ; CFC assay ; equivalence ; Deming and Passing Bablok regressions ; Pearson correlation ; measurement error
Abstract:

Colony-forming cell (CFC) assay is an in vitro assay used in the study of hematopoietic stem cells. HemoGenix is Adenosine TrihosPhate (ATP)-based, in vitro bioluminescence and cell-based assay. Both assays measure the ability of hematopoietic progenitor's proliferation and differentiation. The objective of the study is to investigate if the two assays are equivalent. Both assays were applied to cell samples from 6 donors and 10 cancer patients. ATPs and Colony-forming units (CFUs) were obtained. Both Deming and Passing Bablok regressions along with Pearson correlation coefficient were used to evaluate the equivalence and association of two assays. The results from both regression models (ATP = ?+?*CFU+ ?) were ? = -0.347 (95% CI: -0.489, -0.205) (Deming) and ? = -0.32 (95% CI: -0.42, -0.18) (Passing Bablok), and ? = 0.0078 (95% CI: 0.007, 0.009) (Deming) and ? = 0.0076 (95% CI: 0.006, 0.008) (Passing Bablok). The results demonstrate that the two assays were not equivalent as intercept is significantly from 0 and slope is significantly from 1, although there was a strong positive association between the two assays with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.97 (p < 0.0001).


Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2015 program





For program information, contact the JSM Registration Department or phone (888) 231-3473.

For Professional Development information, contact the Education Department.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.

2015 JSM Online Program Home