Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
564
|
Type:
|
Contributed
|
Date/Time:
|
Wednesday, August 6, 2014 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
|
Sponsor:
|
Biopharmaceutical Section
|
Abstract #313181
|
View Presentation
|
Title:
|
Comparisons of Various Techniques in Propensity Score Estimation Using Simulation
|
Author(s):
|
Jiaxiao Shi*+ and Wansu Chen
|
Companies:
|
Kaiser Permanente and Kaiser Permanente
|
Keywords:
|
Logistic Regression ;
GBM ;
GAM ;
NNET ;
TMLA
|
Abstract:
|
Propensity score (PS) method has been increasingly used to address confounding issues when evaluating causal effects. The score is often estimated using the logistic regression model (LR), an approach that is not convenient for handling non-linear relationships between the exposure and covariates/confounders or interactions. Several non-parametric methods have been suggested as alternative techniques to estimate PS. They include generalized additive models (GAM), classification and regression trees (CART), generalized boosted models (GBM), neural networks (NNET) and targeted maximum estimation (TMLA). Simulation was conducted to compare the performance of LR, GAM, CART, GBM, NN, TMLA under varying degrees of non-linearity between the exposure and covariates, outcome rates and relative risks (RR). PS was applied into the outcome models by using regression adjustment. Our results showed that the recently developed TMLA had comparable performance compared with other non-parametric approaches in terms of bias and mean square errors.
|
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2014 program
|
2014 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Professional Development program, please contact the Education Department.
The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Copyright © American Statistical Association.