Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
518
|
Type:
|
Contributed
|
Date/Time:
|
Wednesday, August 6, 2014 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
|
Sponsor:
|
Section on Statistical Education
|
Abstract #311663
|
|
Title:
|
Heuristic Biases in an Introductory Statistics Course
|
Author(s):
|
Andrew Neath*+
|
Companies:
|
SIU Edwardsville
|
Keywords:
|
statistics education ;
scientific reasoning ;
fallacy of the transposed conditional ;
representativeness ;
base rates
|
Abstract:
|
Our minds rely on heurisitic thinking and intuition, often with much success. However, a major bias in our heuristic thinking stems from an inability to properly account for the role that randomness plays in the world. It should be expected that formal statistical training would lead to a scientific approach free of such bias. I will argue that the traditional approach to teaching introductory statistics is, in fact, promoting methods based on the same illusions that corrupt our heuristic thinking. A consequence of this approach to teaching statistics is an issue currently faced in science where an unacceptably large proportion of "statistically" established findings fail upon attempts at replication.
|
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2014 program
|
2014 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Professional Development program, please contact the Education Department.
The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Copyright © American Statistical Association.