The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
326
|
Type:
|
Invited
|
Date/Time:
|
Tuesday, August 2, 2011 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
|
Sponsor:
|
Social Statistics Section
|
Abstract - #300089 |
Title:
|
Experimental Designs for Identifying Causal Mechanisms
|
Author(s):
|
Kosuke Imai*+ and Dustin Tingley and Teppei Yamamoto
|
Companies:
|
Princeton University and Harvard University and Princeton University
|
Address:
|
Department of Politics, Princeton, NJ, 08540,
|
Keywords:
|
causal inference ;
causal effects ;
indirect effects ;
direct effects ;
identification ;
causal mediation
|
Abstract:
|
Experimentation is a powerful methodology that enables scientists to empirically establish causal claims. However, one important criticism is that experiments merely provide a black-box view of causality and fail to identify causal mechanisms. Critics argue that although experiments can identify average causal effects, they cannot explain how such effects come about. If true, this represents a serious limitation of experimentation, especially for social and medical science research whose primary goal is to identify causal mechanisms. In this paper, we consider several different experimental designs and compare their identification power. Some of these designs require the direct manipulation of mechanisms, while others can be used even when only imperfect manipulation is possible. We use recent social science experiments to illustrate the key ideas that underlie each design.
|
The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2011 program
|
2011 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.