|
Activity Number:
|
452
|
|
Type:
|
Invited
|
|
Date/Time:
|
Wednesday, August 5, 2009 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
|
|
Sponsor:
|
IMS
|
| Abstract - #303052 |
|
Title:
|
MCMC: Does It Work? How Can We Tell?
|
|
Author(s):
|
Charles J. Geyer*+
|
|
Companies:
|
The University of Minnesota
|
|
Address:
|
313 Ford Hall, School of Statistics, Minneapolis, MN, 55455,
|
|
Keywords:
|
Markov chain Monte Carlo ; programming ; convergence ; diagnostics
|
|
Abstract:
|
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is the only method that perhaps works for many complicated problems, but in practice it has two severe difficulties. When the only thing known about a probability distribution is what one learns from an MCMC sampler that purports to sample that distribution, it is very difficult to debug or validate the sampler and very difficult to know how long to run the sampler. In practice, most samplers are so complicated that theorems about convergence do not apply or do not give useful information. Much of the literature discusses toy problems for which a few thousand iterations suffice. In real applications, billions of iterations may not be enough. We provide some help with the debugging issue, giving guidelines for writing MCMC code. We can provide only negative information about diagnostics. Other than perfect sampling, no valid MCMC diagnostics exist.
|
- The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
- Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2009 program |