JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #301703

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 387
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #301703
Title: Quality Control of Data Entry for the American Community Survey and the Impact of Errors on Data Quality
Author(s): Andre L. Williams*+ and Rita J. Petroni and Bryan D. Garrett
Companies: U.S. Census Bureau and U.S. Census Bureau and U.S. Census Bureau
Address: 4700 Silver Hill Rd. STOP 9200, Washington, DC, 20233-9200,
Keywords: mail-out ; keying ; data capture ; consequential errors ; quality control
Abstract:

The American Community Survey (ACS) is being developed by the Census Bureau to replace the decennial census long form. ACS collects important socioeconomic data continuously in three-month cycles. ACS mails out questionnaires during month one, then follows nonrespondents with computer assisted telephone and personal interviewing in months two and three, respectively. The paper questionnaires from mail-out are keyed. ACS has a quality control program which samples keyed documents and estimates keying error rates. A sample of errors from the 2002 ACS was examined to measure the impact of keying errors on data quality. Examination of these errors led to the classification of some errors as inconsequential since they were not expected to affect data quality. This paper estimates ACS keying error rates, provides a preliminary estimate of the proportion of errors that affect data quality, compares ACS error rates of related data capture methods used by Census 2000, and describes the distribution of the main types of keying errors.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004