JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #302262

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 103
Type: Topic Contributed
Date/Time: Monday, August 9, 2004 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Social Statistics Section
Abstract - #302262
Title: Qui Bono? Winners and Losers in the California Public Higher Education System
Author(s): Walter R. Allen*+
Companies: University of California, Los Angeles
Address: Dept. of Sociology, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1551,
Keywords: educational inequality ; California high school students ; race, class, gender disparities in educational achievement
Abstract:

Why and how are statistics used so widely to explain educational inequities across racial groups? To what extent do conventional statistical approaches reproduce and validate race/ethnic/class/gender disparities in educational achievement? Given the pervasive "race blindness" in much of this literature, can statistics allow us to explore how deeply race affects educational processes and simultaneously lead us to do research that puts the humanity of individuals and groups at the forefront? Our approach is informed by empirical research on educational inequality in California that uses quantitative and qualitative data to illustrate the importance of codependent causal factors. After offering a critique of how statistics in key studies on educational inequality have been utilized in dehumanizing ways, we posit alternative theoretical explanations and challenge orthodox methods of examining educational experiences and outcomes. We then provide an in-depth case study of one anti-racist project that uses statistics as a central way of examining educational success and aspirations of high school students (CHOICES).


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004