JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #302255

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 400
Type: Topic Contributed
Date/Time: Thursday, August 12, 2004 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #302255
Title: Latent Class Models for Analysis of Response Error and Rotation Group Bias in the Current Population Survey
Author(s): Khandaker Mansur*+ and Bac Tran
Companies: U.S. Census Bureau and U.S. Census Bureau
Address: , Ellicott City, MD, 21042-5925,
Keywords: latent class models ; panel design ; unemployment ; rotation group bias ; misclassification errors ; response errors
Abstract:

The Current Population Survey (CPS) uses a 4-8-4 rotating panel design. For any given month, the CPS sample can be grouped into eight subsamples corresponding to the eight rotation groups. It is well known that in a rotating panel design survey estimates for the same characteristics from different rotation groups relating to the same time period have different expected values, depending on the length of the time they have been included in the sample. This phenomenon is called rotation group bias. Latent class models are used here for the analysis of response error in the CPS. Latent class analysis (LCA) is used here to estimate the misclassification rates and to assess their impact on labor force estimates. The paper investigates the validity and efficiency of using LCA to estimate rotation group bias, response error and response probabilities. This paper studies response errors in the CPS and assesses their impact on the rotation group bias. The paper also discusses Shockey's results on rotation group bias and attempts to determine why the sizes of his rotation group bias are much larger than those reported by other authors, specifically Bailar (1975) and Mansur (1999) estimates. The paper also compares the response probabilities to those obtained from the Markov Latent Class Analysis presented in Tran (2003).


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004