JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #301994

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 385
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Biometrics Section
Abstract - #301994
Title: Assessing Adequacy of the Covariance Structure in the Generalized Linear Mixed Model
Author(s): Jean Orelien*+
Companies: SciMetrika
Address: 2 Davis Dr., Durham, NC, 27709,
Keywords: mixed model ; goodness-of-fit ; covariance structure
Abstract:

In the generalized linear mixed model, few tools are available for assessing the adequacy of the covariance structure. Statistics such as the Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT), the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) or the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) provide a way to compare the fit of a model against another one. Other statistics such as the concordance correlation coefficient and other pseudo R-squares have been proposed to assess goodness-of-fit for the model at hand without requiring the fit of a second model. None of the statistics mentioned above provide a way to ascertain the appropriateness of the covariance structure. Vonesh and Chinchilli (1986) proposed a test to compare the covariance of the parameter estimates from a generalized linear mixed model to the robust covariance matrix from a generalized estimated equation (GEE) model. However, the performance of this test has not been fully evaluated in simulation (results from a limited simulation of 400 samples were offered) or proven analytically. We present results from a simulation that estimates the empirical Type I error rate and power of this test for various types of covariance structures.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004