JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #301746

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 192
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Section on Statistics and Marketing
Abstract - #301746
Title: Reducing Respondent Burden in Ranking Tasks: Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis of Pairwise Comparisons with Covariates
Author(s): Well Howell*+
Companies: Harris Interactive
Address: 5 Independence Way, Princeton, NJ, 08540,
Keywords: hierarchical Bayesian analysis ; Bradley-Terry Model ; pairwise comparisons
Abstract:

Hierarchical Bayesian (HB) analysis of pairwise comparison data with respondent covariates as suggested by Allenby and Ginter reduces the number of comparisons needed per respondent. Marketing practitioners seek respondent level information about which product attributes are more important in stimulating a first purchase or which features make a product more useful. The key issue is how attributes are ranked on some utility scale. However, self-reported utility measurements are notoriously unreliable. Pairs of attributes can be compared instead, but this quickly becomes an overwhelming task, as an 11-item list would produce 55 possible pairs. This task can be fractionalized so that each respondent sees only a portion of all pairs. The data are then analyzed with an HB model that includes respondent-level covariates in the prior. This paper shows that useful results can be produced on a test dataset with reduced respondent burden when covariates are included in the model, and that these results appear more accurate than those produced by alternative HB models or an aggregate-level analysis.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004